Violence And Hate Crime And Violence Through Intercultural...

Violence and hate crimes are frequent in the United States and have become a major issue for many people. Violence comes in many different forms such as domestic, societal, and individual. Violence is the main cause of distress and has the power to tear families apart. As a result, the newer generation of kids are left to deal with insecurity, inequality, and injustice. In order to ensure that people carry out the proper approach to violence, professionals and even every day individuals must be trained through education or forums on how to manage these issues. The purpose of this paper is to provide an intercultural approach to reduce the violence and the suffering that many communities face. This paper provides an intervention to hate crime and violence through intercultural praxis, education, and socially responsible actions. Social violence or crimes involves people from different cultures and their diversity lead to emergence of superiority and inferiority (In Sorrells In Sekimo to, 2015). Cultural groups that are seen as inferior are looked down upon by superior cultures which then creates a rivalry. To end this violence, education and awareness must be the key first and foremost, then intercultural praxis and social responsibilities will help to an extent. The main focus will be on the historical ideas, concepts and theories that explain the creation of social violence as well as hate crime. Many factors contribute to social violence, while some of them come from

Implications for the Future Free Essays

Communities around the world face pollution problems on one level or another. Pollution exists in a number of forms, including noise, air, land, water, indoor, and outdoor. Humans are affected by pollution both physically and emotionally through the effect on the environment and physical health. We will write a custom essay sample on Implications for the Future or any similar topic only for you Order Now The life blood of the community is the water source, whether it comes from a river, well, or water treatment plant. The purpose of this paper is to review one pollution problem faced by a community, how the problem affects the psychological health of the community and purpose a solution to that problem. The chosen topic for this paper is water control which will include the pollution problem of water control, the effects on humans, conservation techniques, and barriers to solving the problem. Psychology and the Preservation of the Environment A diverse relationship exists between psychology and the preservation of the environment. The world of psychology covers an extremely huge realm, which is full of different areas and much information. Inside this realm is the notion of the environment, which surrounds human beings. The word â€Å"environment† is composed of diverse concepts and possesses an extremely large definition or can be quite specific. Certain examples of environments are institutions, office or event buildings, or family settings, to name just a few (Veitch Arkkelin, 1995). Resources have grown less available over the years. When compared to many years ago when resources like water were in abundance and human beings did not need to concern themselves with running out of this resource, today water and other resources are revealing signs of extreme reduction. This indicates that if the population does not work to conserve these resources, they could evaporate ultimately. One main relationship or connection between psychology and preservation is behavior. Human beings behave in a certain manner, which is influenced by their capability and willingness. These behaviors can possess an effect on the preservation of the natural environment. Nevertheless, a human being’s behavior can be altered to fit the needs of other individuals (Veitch Arkkelin, 1995). The main component of this behavior modification is the motivation of the human being because if people do not yearn to adapt their behavior, the essential behavior changes will not take place (Veitch Arkkelin, 1995). The following is an example of the need for adaptive behavior for the occurrence of water conservation. If a human being possesses a large swimming pool, he or she will most likely be adding water on a normal basis to keep water in the pool and to keep it clean. In addition cleaning and replacing filthy water for clean water is an excellent way to maintain a sanitary swimming pool. However, certain individuals exist who quickly refill their swimming pools with more water once a small amount is splashed out. When a decrease in water availability exists, a human being must alter his or her behavior to preserve water. Furthermore, an individual must be willing to desist from refilling his or her water when this happens. This involves certain behavior alterations, which if an individual can achieve can create a huge contribution to his or her environment. However, if an individual does not change his or her behavior, the government body that observes the accessibility of water will need to create a decision regarding how to decrease the water consumption. Numerous issues regarding preserving and conserving the environment possess a focus throughout psychology. As the population evolves and human beings help to protect the environment, people in the intended environment will begin to adapt (Veitch Arkkelin, 1995). Young children will learn to preserve water and other natural resources. Furthermore, the generation of these young children will adapt easier compared to their parents who knowingly had to change their behavior to preserve the natural resources within their environment. Solution for Water Pollutants Community and Factory Solution In 1972, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act that is now known as the Clean Water Act (CWA) was formed (NPDES. 2011). What this act was to ensure is that there are regulations put in place for the pollutants entering the water from point sources in the United States. Industries are given a limit of how much and how they are disposing of harmful chemicals that will either go directly into the water or into sources that will reach water supplies (NPDES. 2011). Rules, limits, regulations as well as permits are needed for disposal of toxins (NPDES. 2011). Workplaces, factories, and manufacturing plants have been fined, but still continue to release harmful toxins that go against the regulations of the CWA (Dissenting, 2000). The issue with this is that the problem still arises and many of these places are not punished for the crimes they are committing (Dissenting, 2000). As of this time the penalties are a fine of between $5,000 and $50,000 a day as well as but not necessarily, including possible jail time of no more than three years (Dissenting, 2000). Penalties need to be more extensive with laws that also state that after so many offenses that the factories are shut down with a possible permanent license removal. It would also be feasible to have the fines start at the $5,000 to $50,000 a day but have them go up a percentage each day or a larger percentage weekly, however, not to exceed a number of days without loss of licensing and permit loss. Second offense would be the same although time that elapses without license or permit is to be extended. Personal or Household Solution Many brands are labeling their products as â€Å"green† (Yu, 2010, April). It is difficult to know what one is buying when he or she flips to the back of a product and still many of the ingredients are unrecognizable. Many people will pay more money for products in the hopes of buying a product that will be better for the environment, themselves, and family. Federal regulation at this time expresses leniency on companies using the word â€Å"green† in their products (Yu, 2010, April). Some companies are using phrases like †nontoxic† such as Simple Green, although the products still contain chemicals that are found to cause red cell damage and even reproductive issues in animals (Yu, 2010, April). Other companies are using the term â€Å"green,† and this actually means in the product is that they are using the least toxic chemicals found in the group which the chemicals are classified under (Yu, 2010, April). There are many simple tricks, or products people may use that they generally have lying around the house. This will ensure that the people know what  products they are using and know that the toxins are not in what they are using. Here are some helpful tips. Bathtubs, Floors, and hard to scrub areas (baking soda with vinegar) Cutting Boards and Counters (Hot water and vinegar) Furniture (Microfiber cloth dampened) Polished Furniture (A regular cloth and an oil base, such as olive oil or even a citrus oil) Windows (isopropyl alcohol, water, and vinegar) Air Freshener (Water, baking soda, and lemon or even fabric softener) Mold (one part peroxide to two parts water let sit for one hour) Barriers to the Solution Big corporations, manufacturing companies, and utilities have been given a set of rules and regulations to follow when the use and disposal of chemicals are involved. Often penalties have been enforced for disregarding regulations and the discovery of illegal dumping; however, this has not stopped the problem. Enforcing the regulations and ensuring payments of the fines given has proven to be a difficult task. Political lobbyist hired by the corporations have helped to protect the interests of the companies by effectively limiting the amount of the fines and helped to create legal loop holes to avoid paying those fines. The legal battles which may be successfully brought before a court can take years to win and with the financial resources on the side of corporations the cases sometimes never make it into court. In addition the sum of the fine is often easier to pay so the companies can go about their business. Increasing regulations and raising the limits on the fines could be beneficial but difficult to achieve because of the political action of hired lobbyist. Outcome and Justification Water pollution is a serious problem that is affecting the environment in multiple ways. By limiting the amount of pollution, the environment may be preserved. Behavior modification techniques can enforce proper waste control and proper chemical use. To preserve the environment, harsher punishments are suggested for companies that violate the regulations of the Clean Water Act. Fines are currently at a flat rate per violation. A suggested action is to increase the fine until the regulations are followed. In the case that regulations are continually violated, companies should face loss of license. These suggestions may prove difficult to enforce because of legal and political barriers. Household pollution can be limited by changing the use of products. Some products are misleading in advertisements and claims; phrases such as â€Å"green† and â€Å"non-toxic† do not always mean chemical free. These types of products can cause severe damage to the environment, animals, and people. Behavior modification is the basis behind the suggestions to reduce and prevent water pollution in both industrial environments and in the household. Behavior modification relies on the concept of conditioning (Sullivan, 2009). Behaviorism was based on the idea that individuals had no free will and all actions could be explained using stimuli and responses. Operant conditioning modifies behavior through rewards and punishment. To encourage a behavior, a reward is offered upon completion of the behavior (Sullivan, 2009). To reduce a behavior, a punishment is given upon each occurrence of the undesired behavior. Using rewards and punishments, behavior can be modified. In this situation, behavior can be modified to reduce pollution (Sullivan, 2009). In the case of companies violating regulations of the Clean Water Act, a punishment would be given with each violation. If the severity of the punishment is sufficient, the behavior will be less likely to occur again. The idea behind increasing the fines is that increasing the severity of the punishment will decrease the likelihood of repeat behavior. In the situation of chemical use and pollution in the household, rewards may be used to modify behavior. Suggested alternatives to harmful chemicals are less costly and simple to use. Benefits also include a sense of health safety when harsh chemicals are not present. The financial reward of not buying chemicals and less concern for health may increase the likelihood of using home remedies rather than chemical filled products. Small changes can create differences in actions and the influence on the environment. Behavior modification regarding water pollution may reduce pollution and preserve the environment. Conclusion Pollution plagues communities around the world affecting health and the environment. Identifying pollution problems, their causes, and solutions is the key to preserving the future for the next generations. Water is a necessity for every living organism on the planet and clean drinking water is a must for humans and animals alike. Once the target pollution issue has been identified, creating a workable solution that can be accomplished by all those in the community is the next important step. Every potential solution may have various barriers to overcome, such as political, legal, and financial considerations. Political barriers, such as corporate lobbyist are likely to be a problem. However, environmental lobbyists are helping to fight solutions to pollution and the damage it is doing to the earth and humans. The implications for the future are not very promising without conscientious changes individually and communally. How to cite Implications for the Future, Papers Implications for the Future Free Essays Communities around the world face pollution problems on one level or another. Pollution exists in a number of forms, including noise, air, land, water, indoor, and outdoor. Humans are affected by pollution both physically and emotionally through the effect on the environment and physical health. We will write a custom essay sample on Implications for the Future or any similar topic only for you Order Now The life blood of the community is the water source, whether it comes from a river, well, or water treatment plant. The purpose of this paper is to review one pollution problem faced by a community, how the problem affects the psychological health of the community and purpose a solution to that problem. The chosen topic for this paper is water control which will include the pollution problem of water control, the effects on humans, conservation techniques, and barriers to solving the problem. Psychology and the Preservation of the Environment A diverse relationship exists between psychology and the preservation of the environment. The world of psychology covers an extremely huge realm, which is full of different areas and much information. Inside this realm is the notion of the environment, which surrounds human beings. The word â€Å"environment† is composed of diverse concepts and possesses an extremely large definition or can be quite specific. Certain examples of environments are institutions, office or event buildings, or family settings, to name just a few (Veitch Arkkelin, 1995). Resources have grown less available over the years. When compared to many years ago when resources like water were in abundance and human beings did not need to concern themselves with running out of this resource, today water and other resources are revealing signs of extreme reduction. This indicates that if the population does not work to conserve these resources, they could evaporate ultimately. One main relationship or connection between psychology and preservation is behavior. Human beings behave in a certain manner, which is influenced by their capability and willingness. These behaviors can possess an effect on the preservation of the natural environment. Nevertheless, a human being’s behavior can be altered to fit the needs of other individuals (Veitch Arkkelin, 1995). The main component of this behavior modification is the motivation of the human being because if people do not yearn to adapt their behavior, the essential behavior changes will not take place (Veitch Arkkelin, 1995). The following is an example of the need for adaptive behavior for the occurrence of water conservation. If a human being possesses a large swimming pool, he or she will most likely be adding water on a normal basis to keep water in the pool and to keep it clean. In addition cleaning and replacing filthy water for clean water is an excellent way to maintain a sanitary swimming pool. However, certain individuals exist who quickly refill their swimming pools with more water once a small amount is splashed out. When a decrease in water availability exists, a human being must alter his or her behavior to preserve water. Furthermore, an individual must be willing to desist from refilling his or her water when this happens. This involves certain behavior alterations, which if an individual can achieve can create a huge contribution to his or her environment. However, if an individual does not change his or her behavior, the government body that observes the accessibility of water will need to create a decision regarding how to decrease the water consumption. Numerous issues regarding preserving and conserving the environment possess a focus throughout psychology. As the population evolves and human beings help to protect the environment, people in the intended environment will begin to adapt (Veitch Arkkelin, 1995). Young children will learn to preserve water and other natural resources. Furthermore, the generation of these young children will adapt easier compared to their parents who knowingly had to change their behavior to preserve the natural resources within their environment. Solution for Water Pollutants Community and Factory Solution In 1972, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act that is now known as the Clean Water Act (CWA) was formed (NPDES. 2011). What this act was to ensure is that there are regulations put in place for the pollutants entering the water from point sources in the United States. Industries are given a limit of how much and how they are disposing of harmful chemicals that will either go directly into the water or into sources that will reach water supplies (NPDES. 2011). Rules, limits, regulations as well as permits are needed for disposal of toxins (NPDES. 2011). Workplaces, factories, and manufacturing plants have been fined, but still continue to release harmful toxins that go against the regulations of the CWA (Dissenting, 2000). The issue with this is that the problem still arises and many of these places are not punished for the crimes they are committing (Dissenting, 2000). As of this time the penalties are a fine of between $5,000 and $50,000 a day as well as but not necessarily, including possible jail time of no more than three years (Dissenting, 2000). Penalties need to be more extensive with laws that also state that after so many offenses that the factories are shut down with a possible permanent license removal. It would also be feasible to have the fines start at the $5,000 to $50,000 a day but have them go up a percentage each day or a larger percentage weekly, however, not to exceed a number of days without loss of licensing and permit loss. Second offense would be the same although time that elapses without license or permit is to be extended. Personal or Household Solution Many brands are labeling their products as â€Å"green† (Yu, 2010, April). It is difficult to know what one is buying when he or she flips to the back of a product and still many of the ingredients are unrecognizable. Many people will pay more money for products in the hopes of buying a product that will be better for the environment, themselves, and family. Federal regulation at this time expresses leniency on companies using the word â€Å"green† in their products (Yu, 2010, April). Some companies are using phrases like †nontoxic† such as Simple Green, although the products still contain chemicals that are found to cause red cell damage and even reproductive issues in animals (Yu, 2010, April). Other companies are using the term â€Å"green,† and this actually means in the product is that they are using the least toxic chemicals found in the group which the chemicals are classified under (Yu, 2010, April). There are many simple tricks, or products people may use that they generally have lying around the house. This will ensure that the people know what  products they are using and know that the toxins are not in what they are using. Here are some helpful tips. Bathtubs, Floors, and hard to scrub areas (baking soda with vinegar) Cutting Boards and Counters (Hot water and vinegar) Furniture (Microfiber cloth dampened) Polished Furniture (A regular cloth and an oil base, such as olive oil or even a citrus oil) Windows (isopropyl alcohol, water, and vinegar) Air Freshener (Water, baking soda, and lemon or even fabric softener) Mold (one part peroxide to two parts water let sit for one hour) Barriers to the Solution Big corporations, manufacturing companies, and utilities have been given a set of rules and regulations to follow when the use and disposal of chemicals are involved. Often penalties have been enforced for disregarding regulations and the discovery of illegal dumping; however, this has not stopped the problem. Enforcing the regulations and ensuring payments of the fines given has proven to be a difficult task. Political lobbyist hired by the corporations have helped to protect the interests of the companies by effectively limiting the amount of the fines and helped to create legal loop holes to avoid paying those fines. The legal battles which may be successfully brought before a court can take years to win and with the financial resources on the side of corporations the cases sometimes never make it into court. In addition the sum of the fine is often easier to pay so the companies can go about their business. Increasing regulations and raising the limits on the fines could be beneficial but difficult to achieve because of the political action of hired lobbyist. Outcome and Justification Water pollution is a serious problem that is affecting the environment in multiple ways. By limiting the amount of pollution, the environment may be preserved. Behavior modification techniques can enforce proper waste control and proper chemical use. To preserve the environment, harsher punishments are suggested for companies that violate the regulations of the Clean Water Act. Fines are currently at a flat rate per violation. A suggested action is to increase the fine until the regulations are followed. In the case that regulations are continually violated, companies should face loss of license. These suggestions may prove difficult to enforce because of legal and political barriers. Household pollution can be limited by changing the use of products. Some products are misleading in advertisements and claims; phrases such as â€Å"green† and â€Å"non-toxic† do not always mean chemical free. These types of products can cause severe damage to the environment, animals, and people. Behavior modification is the basis behind the suggestions to reduce and prevent water pollution in both industrial environments and in the household. Behavior modification relies on the concept of conditioning (Sullivan, 2009). Behaviorism was based on the idea that individuals had no free will and all actions could be explained using stimuli and responses. Operant conditioning modifies behavior through rewards and punishment. To encourage a behavior, a reward is offered upon completion of the behavior (Sullivan, 2009). To reduce a behavior, a punishment is given upon each occurrence of the undesired behavior. Using rewards and punishments, behavior can be modified. In this situation, behavior can be modified to reduce pollution (Sullivan, 2009). In the case of companies violating regulations of the Clean Water Act, a punishment would be given with each violation. If the severity of the punishment is sufficient, the behavior will be less likely to occur again. The idea behind increasing the fines is that increasing the severity of the punishment will decrease the likelihood of repeat behavior. In the situation of chemical use and pollution in the household, rewards may be used to modify behavior. Suggested alternatives to harmful chemicals are less costly and simple to use. Benefits also include a sense of health safety when harsh chemicals are not present. The financial reward of not buying chemicals and less concern for health may increase the likelihood of using home remedies rather than chemical filled products. Small changes can create differences in actions and the influence on the environment. Behavior modification regarding water pollution may reduce pollution and preserve the environment. Conclusion Pollution plagues communities around the world affecting health and the environment. Identifying pollution problems, their causes, and solutions is the key to preserving the future for the next generations. Water is a necessity for every living organism on the planet and clean drinking water is a must for humans and animals alike. Once the target pollution issue has been identified, creating a workable solution that can be accomplished by all those in the community is the next important step. Every potential solution may have various barriers to overcome, such as political, legal, and financial considerations. Political barriers, such as corporate lobbyist are likely to be a problem. However, environmental lobbyists are helping to fight solutions to pollution and the damage it is doing to the earth and humans. The implications for the future are not very promising without conscientious changes individually and communally. How to cite Implications for the Future, Papers

Analysis of Hospitality in Sharing Economy-Samples for Students

Question: Anayse Hospitality in Sharing Economy. Answer: Introduction Sharing economy is a term which can be used to describe various economic activities related to online transactions. The sharing economy deals with growing out of the open-source community to refer to the peer-to-peer based sharing of the access to services and goods. This term can also be used for the purpose of describing the sales transactions that are done through the online market area. This is an economic model which can be defined as the peer-to-peer based activity related to acquiring of goods, providing the goods and sharing the access to these services and goods which is facilitated by an online platform which is community based (Cohen and Sundararajan 2015). Sharing economy can also be termed as collaborative consumption which is a trending concept in business. This concept mainly highlights the abilities of the individuals to borrow or rent goods instead of owning or buying them. Benefits and the reasons for motivating tourists related to usage of sharing economy Sharing economy has become the latest trend in the technology world and it has influenced all the major sectors and industries. The hotel and hospitality industry has been greatly influenced by the sharing economy concept. This concept is mainly a socio-economic economic system which is built around sharing of physical and human related resources. This includes the shared creation, distribution and the production of goods in the market. This is related to the ability of the consumers or the firms in granting temporary access to each other to the physical assets which are under-utilized in nature (Cusumano 2015). The entities belonging to the sharing economy shared the goods which are unused with the with the others in the market for short or longer periods of time. The travel industry and the hoteliers have been affected by the concept of sharing economy. The process of sharing by the various entities like, the hosts who provide the list of their unused rooms or the hosts who are permanently away from their homes have posed a threat to the hotel industry. The hoteliers therefore come together to provide alternate accommodation related facilities in the sharing economy. The sharing economy has been watched by the hoteliers quite closely and they are also planning to offer shared rooms for the travellers who seek different experience in their tours (Ert, Fleischer and Magen 2016). The hotels which are a part of the entire sharing economy related concept include, HomeAway, HomeToGo, Vacations Rentals By Owner (VRBO), FlipKey, Couchsurfing and Airbnb. These organizations have put immense pressure on the operations of traditional hotels. The hotels which provide limited services or select services cater to the business clients. The sharing economy is constantly changing the ways by which think about travelling and reserving their accommodations. The hotels are therefore trying hard to understand the behaviour of the travellers who prefer to make their accommodation and bookings in the shared economy sector (Gursoy 2017). Airbnb is the largest operator in the new concept of shared economy that is used by the travellers to book their accommodations. The travellers who use the services provided by the accommodation facilities in sharing economy include those who desire for more social interactions with the local residents and have unique experiences in the authentic hotel settings. This provides them with the reason to travel more and stay longer in the hotels. The major drivers which affect peer-to-peer accommodation related facilities are the active usage of internet, the age of customers, the availability of technologies and the frequency of their international travel (Hamari, Sjklint and Ukkonen 2016). The development of sharing economy has been able to shake up the hotel industry. The transactions related to shared economy occur directly between the private people and the major hotel brands in the distinctive hospitality industry. The hoteliers are trying to capture the opportunities and the challenges that are being faced by the marketplace due to the advent sharing economy. The conventional experience provided by the hospitality industry have been challenged and are being tested in ways which were not imagined before. The hotels which are technologically advanced and can understand the importance related to guest experience, this opportunity can help them in increasing their revenues and profitability (Interian 2016). The hoteliers therefore need to use this opportunity so that they are able to meet the services related to localization that are provided to the guests. The hoteliers can gain competitive advantage in the industry not only by providing the best rates, they also nee d to understand the minds of the customers. The sharing economy is likely to rise its opportunities in the future in the hospitality industry. This will present many challenges for the other commercial hotels in the market, which will put immense pressure on these hotels to maintain their profitable operations (Lu and Kandampully 2016). Hospitality experience provided by sharing economy The hospitality experience that is provided by the sharing accommodations are authentic in nature as the travellers can live in the hotels like the locals. The consumers have also started demanding experiences where they are able to interact with the locals of that area and live in the hotels like the locals do. These demands have impacted the services that are offered by the shared accommodation providers. The travellers have constantly started demanding for the authentic services which can make them feel like they are part of the place where they have visited. This further tends to increase their time of stay and they begin to mix with the local culture of the area (Matzler, Veider and Kathan 2015). The three major themes that have been given importance by the providers of shared accommodation services are, unique accommodation and interiors, interaction with the hosts, and the interactions with the local culture of the area. The travel experience has been made much more meaningful after the introduction of this concept of accommodation. The peer-to-peer style of accommodation impacts the behaviour of the travellers as well. The major impacts of this process of accommodation are related to increase in travel frequency, expansion in the selection of destination and the increase in the length of stay as well (Mittendorf and Ostermann 2017). The social interactions of the travellers have become more meaningful in nature and reduction of costs related to accommodation have allowed the travellers to consider those destinations which they were not able to afford before. On the other hand, the commercial hotels are unable these social interactions and experiences to the travellers. The travellers who avail the services of commercial hotels are not always able to afford to travel select destinations due to the costs that are associated with the stay in these hotels. The local experience and feel that is provided by the peer-to-peer services are also not available in case of the commercial hotels. This is the main reason due to which it can be stated the commercial hotels are unable to provide authentic experience to the travellers as compared to the peer-to-peer hotel accommodations (Mody 2016). The main customer sector of the commercial hotels are the business travellers. The reason being that these travellers do not intend to extend their stay or have local experience of the area. However, the providers of home sharing networks are trying to capture this market in the near future. This can be a major threat to the operations of the hospitality indus try. The commercial hotels are now trying to capture the market by expanding their portfolios in various other areas and they are further introducing designs that can appeal to the various types of travellers (Mhlmann 2015). The commercial hotels have been compelled to changes their style of business to compete to the peer-to-peer hotel industry. The working environment in the hotels are being changed and the managers can now interact the guests in a casual manner. For example Hyatt Hotels and Resorts have taken these steps with the help of their new brand Hyatt Centric where the approaches related room service have been changed (Oskam and Boswijk 2016). The guests can order their food from the restaurants present within the hotels or the local restaurants and get it delivered in their rooms. This has helped the organization in providing facilities to the guests related to interaction with locals and taking advantage of the local cuisine as well. The interactions of the hotel staff and the guests are now much more natural as compared to the previous times (Scholz 2016). Types of hotels affected by the sharing economy The rise of shared accommodation related facilities in the Asia Pacific region has posed a threat on the commercial hotel industry. The major services providers in this industry who have an impact on the operations of the commercial hotel organizations are, Airbnb, FlipKey, HomeAway, Rommorama. The main advantage of these service providers is the low price that they are able to provide to the travellers and the guests (Schor 2016). The research has identified that the price of accommodation that is provided by shared services is 200% lower as compared to the commercial hotels in cities like, Jakarta, Shenzhen, Ho Chi Minh, Guangzhou, Manila and Jakarta. This has led to the decline in the sales of these hotels as the travellers prefer to use the shared services due to its low cost option. The commercial properties in New York and San Francisco are also facing the same issues due to the rise of shared economy (Schor and Fitzmaurice 2015). The lodging market has faced major changes after the advent of organizations like, Airbnb. The commercial hotels have been earning huge margins in their charges related to the rooms provided to the travellers. The main revenue of these hotels were earned during the time of festivals. The companies like Airbnb have provided many options for travellers who visit the areas the time if festivals so that they can plan their holidays in a more effective manner. The levels of competition between the traditional hotels and Airbnb have increased heavily (Zervas, Proserpio and Byers 2017). The traditional organizations therefore need to put more focus on the care that they are providing to the guests and finding out ways to extend their stay as well. The hotel industry needs to adapt to the changing needs of the consumers and try to enhance their stay in the hotels as well. The collaboration between the members of the team is important for the purpose of providing the best services to the gues ts. The increase in communication levels of the employees in the five star hotels can help in enhancing their profits. Debate on the response of three-star hotel in Adelaide to sharing economy The three-star hotel that is considered in the analysis is The Chifley on South Terrace. This is a hotel which is located in the heart of Adelaide. The organization aims at providing the right balance of comfort and convenience to the guests. The hotel is located in a favourable area where the various commercial areas of the city are located within a short distance. The commercial areas include, Victoria Square, Adelaide Central Market, South Parklands. The hotel provides all the modern amenities to the guests which include, cable programming, Wi-Fi, minibars and the facilities related to effective room service as well (Oskam and Boswijk 2016). The hotel provides high quality levels to the guests and they try to provide their services with respect to their needs. The hotel is located in the heart of the main city of Adelaide and the dining facilities are provided in their sister concern which is not quite far away. The organization provides various offers and facilities to the guests in the season time and at the time of various festivals. The hotel provides many offers which are customised according to the needs of the guests (Scholz 2016). The rooms of the hotel are packed with all the modern amenities that are required for the purpose of a comfortable and luxurious stay. The various types of rooms include from family rooms to deluxe rooms. The rooms also supply high-speed internet services for the convenience of the guests. The different types of levels include, deluxe room, standard twin, executive king, studio queen, junior suite, parklane suite and family room (Chifley on South Terrace, Adelaide 2018). The sales of the hotel have however been affected by the advent of the sharing accommodation related services that are provided by the organizations like, Airbnb. The rates of the various rooms in the hotel are quite high as has been depicted in the website. The luxury class and rates of the various services that are provided by the hotel are the major reasons behind the drop of revenues after the advent of shared accommodation. The guests will be attracted towards the services that are provided by the shared accommodation organizations as the rates are low (Schor 2016). This will have a negative impact on the sales of the hotel and the ways by which they can increase their revenues. The steps that can be taken by the organization to increase their sales and to compete with the organizations providing shared accommodation are related to changes that can be made in the strategies. The rates of the rooms and other amenities provided to the guests need to be lowered so that the hotel can attract more number of guests. The distribution related activities of the hotel can also be improved so that they can provide faster services to the guests. The hotel can attract guests with the help of special packages provided according to their preferences (Hamari, Sjklint and Ukkonen 2016). The management of the hotel needs to create an environment in the hotel where the guests can interact with the local residents of the area. The guests also need to have access to the local cuisine and food as well. The local food items need to be included in the menu of the hotel and the guests can be delivered the food to their respective rooms. The staff need to be trained so that they can interact openly with the guests and provide an atmosphere which is friendly in nature. In this manner, Chifley Hotels can create a competitive position in the industry. They will further be able to ma intain their profitable operations in the industry (Mody 2016). Conclusion The essay can be concluded by stating that the sharing economy and its various aspects have affected the sales and revenue of the commercial hotels. The hotel and hospitality industry has been under immense pressure after the advent of the sharing accommodation related services provided various organizations like Airbnb. The commercial hotels have however started devising strategies which can be helpful for the competition that they can provide to these accommodation services. The homely atmosphere, local interaction and the low costs provided by the sharing accommodation related organization have impacted the revenues of the commercial hotels. These services also need to be provided by the commercial hotels so that they can provide best services to the guests with low margins and rates. References Chifley on South Terrace, Adelaide. (2018).Rooms - Chifley on South Terrace, Adelaide. [online] Available at: https://www.nexthotels.com/chifley/south-terrace-adelaide/rooms/ [Accessed 27 Mar. 2018]. Cohen, M. and Sundararajan, A., 2015. Self-regulation and innovation in the peer-to-peer sharing economy.U. Chi. L. Rev. Dialogue,82, p.116. Cusumano, M.A., 2015. How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy.Communications of the ACM,58(1), pp.32-34. Ert, E., Fleischer, A. and Magen, N., 2016. Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb.Tourism Management,55, pp.62-73. Gursoy, D., 2017. Future of hospitality marketing and management research.Tourism Management Perspectives. Hamari, J., Sjklint, M. and Ukkonen, A., 2016. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,67(9), pp.2047-2059. Interian, J., 2016. Up in the air: Harmonizing the sharing economy through Airbnb regulations.BC Int'l Comp. L. Rev.,39, p.129. Lu, C. and Kandampully, J., 2016. What drives customers to use access-based sharing options in the hospitality industry?.Research in Hospitality Management,6(2), pp.119-125. Matzler, K., Veider, V. and Kathan, W., 2015. Adapting to the sharing economy.MIT Sloan Management Review,56(2), p.71. Mittendorf, C. and Ostermann, U., 2017, January. Private vs. business customers in the sharing economyThe implications of trust, perceived risk, and social motives on Airbnb. InProceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Mody, M., 2016. Creating Memorable Experiences: How hotels can fight back against Airbnb and other sharing economy providers.Boston Hospitality Review,4(2). Mhlmann, M., 2015. Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again.Journal of Consumer Behaviour,14(3), pp.193-207. Oskam, J. and Boswijk, A., 2016. Airbnb: the future of networked hospitality businesses.Journal of Tourism Futures,2(1), pp.22-42. Scholz, T., 2016. Platform cooperativism. Challenging the corporate sharing economy. Schor, J., 2016. DEBATING THE SHARING ECONOMY.Journal of Self-Governance Management Economics,4(3). Schor, J.B. and Fitzmaurice, C.J., 2015. 26. Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy.Handbook of research on sustainable consumption,410. Zervas, G., Proserpio, D. and Byers, J.W., 2017. The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry.Journal of Marketing Research,54(5), pp.687-705